MPS Analysis and Response to the 12/9 AFM-EPF Newsletter

When our trustees sent out a letter one year ago in December of 2016 disclosing for the first time that it was quite possible that we could be facing cuts to our existing benefits as soon as spring 2017 there was a lot of confusion, unanswered questions, and shock. In the months following, when many AFM members looked to our elected leaders and trustees for help, information and a plan. It became clear that our elected leaders were not going to help and that we would have to deal with the pension crisis ourselves. A group of concerned musicians organized to address the ongoing pension crisis and founded Musicians for Pension Security. Our mission statement from the beginning has been clear and simple: We have come together in search of more information about the state of our pension and, ultimately, to demand more transparency and accountability from the AFM-EPF Trustees. With input and participation from plan participants across the country, we will be able to speak with one unified voice working towards a sustainable long-term plan for a secure pension.  

Trustees Tout Expense Cuts But Behind Closed Doors it's Another Story

Recently posted in the Frequently Asked Questions section of the AFM-EPF website is a highly important new disclosure that the trustees have hired Cambridge Associates as an “Outside Chief Investment Officer” (OCIO). This is an important development because it puts in perspective just how out of touch the AFM-EPF trustees are in December 2017. They are not replacing Meketa, our fund investment consultant since 2010, but they are adding another layer of management and expense heaped on top of what is already the bloated administration of our pension fund. It is no wonder that the expenses of the AFM-EPF are by far the highest in our industry. Our trustees spent over $250 million over the last 10 years, with an investment return that is dead last in the business. (The 3 and 5-year returns are also at the bottom of the peer group. See our previous article about these numbers here.)

AFM Endorses Butch Lewis Act, Still Waiting on AFM-EPF Trustees


After months of sustained pressure culminating with thousands of calls and emails to President Ray Hair, the AFM has just officially endorsed the Butch Lewis Act of 2017. We commend them for this act.  It is finally a step in the right direction.

However, it is important to note that the AFM and the AFM-EPF are two separate entities. It took months to just get our union to come out publicly in support the Butch Lewis Act. There is still work to be done. We now need to demand that all the AFM-EPF trustees endorse the Butch Lewis Act, not just our union.

More importantly, we must also see to it that the AFM-EPF trustees cooperate with Senator Sherrod Brown's staff. They have repeatedly asked for the trustees to provide actuarial projections. When received, that data will be analyzed by Senator Brown’s actuaries to show how his proposal could benefit our AFM pension fund. To date, the AFM-EPF has not delivered.

We cannot rest easy with the AFM's support of the Butch Lewis Act alone. While it is important, and we are grateful to have it, what we really need is the full commitment of our AFM-EPF trustees toward this important effort.

One thing is clear, our collective voices have been heard! The coming weeks will show plan participants just how serious the AFM and the AFM-EPF trustees are in supporting the Butch Lewis Act.

MPS wants to thank all of you for the constant support and hard work. Monday's calls to President Hair turned into an AFM endorsement of the Butch Lewis Act on Friday. Without your help, it would have not been possible!  

AFM-EPF Trustees Have Deep Ties to NCCMP

National Coordinating Committee for Multiemployer Plans (NCCMP) is a trade association of multi-employer plans in Washington DC. In 2014, they were instrumental in formulating and passing MPRA, which is the law that would allow cuts to our hard-earned pension benefits. Our pension fund, the AFM-EPF, has deep connections to the NCCMP going back many years. The AFM-EPF is a dues-paying member of NCCMP and our AFM trustees attend their conferences every year. Two of our trustees, Christopher Brockmeyer and Bill Moriarity, serve on NCCMP’s Board of Directors and Steering Committee. Both have given lectures at those conferences. Brockmeyer, the AFM-EPF’s trustee co-chair, served on the NCCMP working group which formulated the MPRA proposal. 

All You Need to Know about The Butch Lewis Act of 2017

The “Butch Lewis Act of 2017” and its House companion bill “The Rehabilitation of Multiemployer Pensions Act," introduced by Senator Sherrod Brown, provide an innovative way to avoid retiree benefit reductions by providing relief to financially-troubled plans.

These bills set up a new office in the Treasury Department called the Pension Rehabilitation Administration (PRA), which would receive proceeds from the issuance of Treasury bonds. This money would then be lent to financially-troubled plans as long as they meet certain criteria. The Pension Rights Center is particularly pleased that the loans would be used to fully pay the benefits of retirees and that the bill would require plans, which have already been approved to cut benefits under MPRA, to apply for these new loans and if approved, use that money to restore previously suspended benefits.

Senator Sherrod Brown’s office has sent MPS the summary, FAQ and the full legislation related to The Butch Lewis Act of 2017. To view, click the links below.

The Butch Lewis Act of 2017 summary.
The Butch Lewis Act of 2017 FAQ.
The Butch Lewis Act of 2017 full legislation.

Senator Sherrod Brown and Congressman Richard Neal Introduce bills to save financially troubled multiemployer plans and protect retirees

Teamsters Support Brown-Neal Legislation to Solve Pension Crisis

Will AFM-EPF Trustees Act on New Pension Legislation?

Just last week, on November 16, many of you received the email from AFM President Ray Hair regarding recently proposed legislation to assist multiemployer pension funds by US Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH). In the email, President Hair says: 

"I have been in direct communication with Senator Brown's staff regarding this legislation. Now that the legislation has officially been introduced, the Trustees of American Federation of Musicians and Employers' Pension Fund (AFM-EPF) will carefully review its specifics to determine if it addresses the issues confronting the AFM-EPF..."

Encouraging words, but so far the Trustees' position on this potentially very helpful piece of legislation has been extremely skeptical.

The Truth About AFM-EPF Expenses

Musicians for Pension Security has found more manipulation of the facts by AFM-EPF Trustees who are desperately trying to spin the truth about the performance of our pension fund.   Recently posted to the AFM-EPF website is an updated presentation concerning our fund performance (click here) where the Trustees state that AFM-EPF administrative expenses are “comparatively low” within the peer group. (See slide 22) The peer group consists of five other pension plans, all in the entertainment industry.


If you've been following MPS news, you're aware that MPRA is a law that would permit our plan trustees to apply to the Department of Treasury to slash our pension benefits (read more here). Since it was enacted in 2014, eighteen pension funds have applied to the United States Treasury under MPRA. But through the end of 2016, not a single one of those applications had been approved—five had been denied outright, and five had withdrawn. Notably, the application of the Central States Teamsters, which involved over $20 billion of unfunded pension liability, was denied. 

Unfortunately, things have changed in 2017. Three applications for MPRA have recently been approved by the United States Treasury, including those from the NY Teamsters and United Furniture Workers Unions in the last three weeks alone. It is of concern that the Department has not denied an application since the inauguration of President Trump.

Comparing the AFM's Two Pension Funds: 

Our AFM-EPF vs. Musicians' Pension Fund of Canada

While researching the dramatic deterioration of our pension fund, Musicians for Pension Security (MPS) continues to be deeply troubled by how, compared to other pension funds in our industry, ours is performing so poorly. Our trustees cite declining demographics, unsatisfactory industry dynamics and changing mortality tables. But a peer AFM musicians’ pension fund, Musicians' Pension Fund of Canada (MPF Canada), is quite healthy, despite the fact that it is subject to the exact same factors cited by AFM-EPF trustees.

MPS Response to Lawsuit

A class action lawsuit was recently filed against the trustees of the AFM- EPF. The central allegation is that Fund trustees failed to properly oversee the investment functions of our plan. In particular, it claims they directed too much plan money into emerging market
stocks, and as a result, the investment returns were lower than if they were invested in US stocks.


MPS responds to President Ray Hair's July 2017 International Musician article

Ray Hair attempts to “bust the myths” related to our pension fund’s crisis in this month’s International Musician, which was copied verbatim from the AFM-EPF June newsletter (that message can be found here and here). President Hair’s message actually raises more questions than it answers.


You may have seen the latest AFM-EPF newsletter, stating, "Our trustees take seriously the commitment to more frequent, comprehensive communication." Last month, Musicians for Pension Security requested a series of documents. We also asked specific questions concerning investments, expenses, lobbying costs and other subjects of vital importance. Not one of these requests for information was honored. In response, Executive Director Maureen Kilkelly simply referred MPS to the disclosure document inventory list on the AFM-EPF website. This list includes several years of actuarial and investment management information, and the copying cost to receive these documents. This information, as required by federal law, must be posted to their website. For our remaining requests, Ms. Kilkelly’s response speaks for itself, “We are not responding to the remaining requests.* ”

MPS Response to 5/19 Funding Status Update from the AFM-EPF

Dear Plan Participants,

By now, many of you received an email from the AFM-EPF stating that our fund earned better-than-expected returns in 2016, and we will not be entering critical and declining status for the next fiscal year (read that email here). Avoiding critical and declining status means that our trustees will not be able to file an application to the U.S. Treasury to cut our hard-earned pension benefits. Under the law, the cuts could be up to 70% of accrued benefits (use this calculating tool to see the maximum reduction you could face).